Legal Opinion

Engis Equipment Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 20, 1969No. C.D. 3670PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The importations in this case consist of auto-collimators which were invoiced as “Optical assemblies modified without electrical equipment * * * suitable for assembly with electrical parts into a complete precision autocollimator * * They were classified by the collector as optical measuring instruments under *30paragraph 228(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, and assessed with duty at the rate of 50 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff’s claim is that the collector’s classification is erroneous and that the autocollimators are properly classifiable under paragraph 360 of the act,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Dwight v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. United States v. BlissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Bendix Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Henry Wild Surveying Instrument Supply Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Celestaire, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Adc Telecommunications, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Larry B. Watson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API