Legal Opinion

Naumes Forwarding Service v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 25, 1957No. 61377; protest 274821-K/7696 (Chicago)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suit listed above challenges the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as “manufactures of metal, nspf,” and levying duty thereon at the rate of 22)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802. Plaintiff claims said merchandise to be properly dutiable at the rate of 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 372 of said act, as modified by the Torquay protocol to said general agreement, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739, as parts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Seawol Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Willoughbys Camera Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API