Hargett v. Gulf Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought separate ¡actions upon three policies of fire insurance, and upon a trial ifi which the actions were consolidated, recovered judgment for the amount of each policy. Defendants Gulf Insurance Company, Firemen’s Insurance Company and Monarch Insurance Company appeal from separate judgments entered against them.
The insured property which was destroyed by fire consisted of certain incubators, which were separately insured by the defendant companies under separate policies, which provided that the insurer would not be liable for loss or damage to any of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Koyer v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Robinson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Phillips v. Reserve Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Vyn v. Northwest Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.