Legal Opinion
Koyer v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1937No. L. A. 16149PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
We have made a thorough examination of the record in this case and have concluded that we are in entire accord with the opinion rendered by the District Court of Appeal and written by Mr. Justice pro tempore Shinn. We adopt this opinion as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“Consolidated actions on policies of fire insurance on account of loss suffered by earthquake.
“The principal defense of the insurers was that the actions could not be maintained because of plaintiff’s alleged failure to comply with the provisions of the policies requiring proceedings for arbitration of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perry v. MagnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Anselmo v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- De Bairos v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Pacific Coast Adjustment Bureau v. Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hargett v. Gulf Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Hughes v. Potomac InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.