Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'n
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The plaintiff is the beneficiary named, in an insurance policy upon the life of one Lemuel T. Murray, the policy.being a certificate of membership issued by defendant to said Murray upon accepting him as a member of said Home Benefit Life Association. By the terms of the certificate, the holder was to pay to the defendant six assessments per annum, at stated times and in stated amounts, and it was also provided that no claim was to be made thereunder “ should the *406member neglect or omit to pay the last assessment that may have been levied on this certificate within thirty days from the date of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Mee v. Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- J. Frank & Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Carlson v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.