Legal Opinion

State v. Ryce

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 26, 2016No. 111,698PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*902The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights protect against unreasonable searches, which in the criminal context means a search must be conducted pursuant to a warrant or a well-recognized exception to the warrant requirement. One of these well-recognized exceptions—the consent exception—arises when an individual voluntarily agrees to allow a search. Courts have generally recognized a search based on consent cannot proceed once a suspect’s consent is withdrawn because, at that…

2Cases cited131 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. NeceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. – State v. Smith –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API