State v. Ryce
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*902The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and § 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights protect against unreasonable searches, which in the criminal context means a search must be conducted pursuant to a warrant or a well-recognized exception to the warrant requirement. One of these well-recognized exceptions—the consent exception—arises when an individual voluntarily agrees to allow a search. Courts have generally recognized a search based on consent cannot proceed once a suspect’s consent is withdrawn because, at that…
2Cases cited131 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- State v. NeceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- – State v. Smith –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.