Legal Opinion
McRae v. Bolstad
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 7, 1982No. 8836-0-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This appeal from a judgment on a verdict of violation of the Consumer Protection Act and fraudulent misrepresentation in the sale of residential real estate raises issues concerning the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86.010 et seq., to conduct governed by the real estate brokers and salesmen act, RCW 18.85.010 et seq., the propriety of numerous jury instructions and the award of attorney's fees.
The facts are these: In November 1977, Nick Mazza of Crescent Realty, Inc. undertook the representation of Morris E. and Donna Mae Bolstad in the sale of their home. At the time…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Lightfoot v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Obde v. SchlemeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.