Nyquist v. Foster
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
— Virgil Nyquist brought this action to rescind the sale of a trailer which he purchased from appellants, Lloyd Foster and Alice H. Foster, doing business as the Sparlux Sales Company. The trial court, sitting without a jury, held that the sale had been induced by fraudulent misrepresentation, and that Nyquist was entitled to rescission.
Foster is a dealer for the Sparton Aircraft Company, a manufacturer of trailers. In the fall of 1951, Nyquist, desiring to buy ah aluminum sidewall trailer, called at Foster’s place of business in south Tacoma. At that time, Foster had no "aluminum trailers…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Schroeder v. Hotel Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Producers Grocery Co. v. Blackwell Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- North Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. Access Road Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Baertschi v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- McInnis & Co. v. Western Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Markov v. ABC Transfer & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Shook v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.