Legal Opinion
Deane Gardenhome Assn. v. Denktas
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1993No. G012381PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALLIN, J.
Deane Gardenhome Association (the Association) filed suit against Haluk and Mary Denktas for injunctive relief and damages after the Denktases allegedly painted their house in violation of the Association’s restrictive covenants (CC&R’s) encumbering the Denktases’ property. The CC&R’s contained an attorney fees provision. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the Denktases, but denied their request for attorney fees. The Denktases appeal, contending the trial court abused its discretion. We reverse and remand with directions.
The Denktases were homeowners in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Braun v. City of TaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nasser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Smith v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Otay River Constructors v. San Diego ExpresswayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Dorman v. DWLC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.