Legal Opinion

Dorman v. DWLC Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1995No. B072335PublishedCited by 21 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This appeal and the related cross-appeal involve the sufficiency of monetary damages awarded to a landlord after a long-time commercial tenant vacated and left the premises in disrepair. The property in question is a commercial building on La Cienega Boulevard in Culver City, which was operated at all relevant times as the Dorman-Winthrop men’s clothing store.

Appellant and cross-respondent, the tenant, is a corporation named DWLC Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Tenant). Respondent and cross-appellant, Morton Dorman, was the landlord at all relevant times…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Deane Gardenhome Assn. v. DenktasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Wimberly v. Derby Cycle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API