Legal Opinion
Peerless Pattern Co. v. Gauntlett Dry Goods Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1912No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by the Peerless Pattern Company against the Gauntlett Dry Goods Company for specific performance of a contract. From an order overruling á demurrer to complainant’s bill, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
This is an injunction bill and one for specific performance of a contract. A demurrer was interposed to the bill of complaint. It was overruled, which action is sought to be reviewed here.
The complainant is the maker of paper patterns. The defendant is the proprietor of a large dry goods store. A written contract was made between the parties, the material parts of which are as follows:
“City or Town — Milan.
“State......Mich.
“The Peerless Pattern Company,
“ 192J to 200 Greene Street,
“ New York City.
“(1) Please send us an assortment of Peerless patterns including the May, 1911, issue, amounting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Standard Fashion Co. v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Old National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Independent Gas & Oil Co. v. T. B. Smith Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. VitulloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane Houston Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.