H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. Vitullo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
This appeal is from a decree restraining defendants, during the year 1944, from making or working on overcoats for anyone other than the plaintiff, a manufacturer of clothing in Philadelphia. The defendants 1 are Nicholas Vitullo and his three sons, trading as N. Vitullo & Sons. This partnership is a clothing contractor, a term, used in the Philadelphia clothing industry, to describe one who works on garments, for a manufacturer of clothing. Both parties have been engaged in the industry for years. The bill was filed December 28, 1943, and was subsequently amended.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- York Railways Co. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Strank v. Mercy Hospital of JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Kaelin v. University of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.