Legal Opinion

H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. Vitullo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1944No. Appeals, 250, 251, 252, 253 and 287PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from a decree restraining defendants, during the year 1944, from making or working on overcoats for anyone other than the plaintiff, a manufacturer of clothing in Philadelphia. The defendants 1 are Nicholas Vitullo and his three sons, trading as N. Vitullo & Sons. This partnership is a clothing contractor, a term, used in the Philadelphia clothing industry, to describe one who works on garments, for a manufacturer of clothing. Both parties have been engaged in the industry for years. The bill was filed December 28, 1943, and was subsequently amended.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. York Railways Co. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Strank v. Mercy Hospital of JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Kaelin v. University of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API