Legal Opinion

Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane Houston Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 28, 1919No. 1343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; Chas. E. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After the per curiam opinion of June 28, 1918, the plaintiff petitioned for a rehearing. The petition *794was granted. The plaintiff has orally and on brief elaborately reargued the case. On careful reconsideration we are constrained to adopt the construction of the contract urged by the plaintiff and. made by the court below..Construing the contract as a whole, we do not think it can fairly be held so ambiguous as, if valid in all its provisions, to warrant the court in refusing the injunction prayed for.

The contract runs for a term of two years from date, and “from term…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mathews Conveyer Co. v. Palmer-Bee Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. S. B. McMaster, Inc. v. Chevrolet Motor Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lipson v. Socony Vacuum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API