E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 12, 1931:
Wickhem, J.
The first contention of the appellant is that the evidence showed a conspiracy between the defendants to defeat plaintiff’s rights under his exclusive sales contract. In its findings of fact the trial court found that the Coca Cola Company consented to the exclusive contract entered into January 10, 1917, by the Western Bottling Company and the plaintiff, and that otherwise it had no participation in that transaction. The court further found that the action of the Western Bottling Company in assuriiing to cancel the agreement of January…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Cheney v. LibbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Higgins v. . EagletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Standard Fashion Co. v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Mantell v. International Plastic Harmonica Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Dade Enterprises, Inc. v. Wometco Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Mendelson v. Blatz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Wilkinson v. PoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.