Irilarry v. City of San Diego
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
The city of San Diego entered into a contract with James Kennedy for the construction of a dam for a reservoir to he used in connection with its municipal waterworks. On May 1, 1918, there was due and unpaid from the city to the contractor the sum of $6,238.16. On May 6, 1918, a writ of attachment issued out of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco in an action brought by Prosper Wolf against James Kennedy, together with a notice of garnishment, were served upon the mayor, auditor, treasurer, and manager of operations of San Diego for the purpose of garnishing all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Merwin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Skelly v. Westminster School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wilson v. WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Walker v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Weiser v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.