Legal Opinion
Nutter v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1946No. Civ. 14950PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.
The city of Santa Monica operates a local and intercity motor coach line, serving the public in the city of Santa Monica, with one branch extending into the westerly section of the city of Los Angeles. The city employs 63 bus operators, 62 of them being members of Lodge No. 22 of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen; they have designated the brotherhood as their collective bargaining agent. Plaintiffs are members and representatives of the brotherhood and they brought this action as such, and in behalf of the members of the brotherhood and of Lodge No. 22 against the city of Santa Monica and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- United States v. HoarU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1821
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- California v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.