Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Walters
California Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1941No. L. A. 17792PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, J. —
Plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of defendant, complied with the provisions of section 710 of the Code of Civil Procedure, authorizing a garnishment or levy of execution against the salary of a public officer or employee. Defendant is a judge of the municipal court in the city of Los Angeles and there was payable to him the salary of that office. Pursuant to said section 710 the documents necessary to garnish that salary were filed with the County Auditor of Los Angeles County, who thereafter paid the same into the Superior Court for Los Angeles County to be by it disbursed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- O'MALLEY v. WoodroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Fitzgerald v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Villanazul v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.