in the Interest of B.T., M.J.R.B., T.B., and M.T., Children
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANNE GARDNER Justice.
Both Father and Mother challenge the trial court’s termination of their parental rights. Both parents assert ineffective assistance of counsel claims and challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support termination. Father also claims that the trial court’s termination order is void. We will affirm.
I. PROCEDURAL ISSUES
A. Background
The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (“TDPRS”) filed its original petition for termination of appellants’ parental rights on June 28, 2002, and that same date the trial court appointed TDPRS temporary managing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- in the Interest of D.A.R., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- In Re DWCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- in the Interest of J.L.C., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.