Legal Opinion
In the Interest of T.N.F.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 22, 2006No. 10-05-00327-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ABATEMENT ORDER
2Per curiam
After a jury trial, the parental rights of Tammy Fulton, Ray Fulton, and Brandon Wobig to their respective children were terminated. All three appeal.
In one issue, Tammy (the mother of all four children), through her appointed appellate counsel, asserts that her appointed trial counsel was ineffective because he: (1) failed to file a motion for new trial and failed to preserve complaints on the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence; (2) had a conflict of interest with his client that hindered his representation of her; and (3) failed to undertake any pretrial *330discovery.…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- In the Interest J.M.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In the Interest of J.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- in the Interest of B.T., M.J.R.B., T.B., and M.T., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
4Cited by14 opinions
- In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Blocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- in the Interest of B.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
- In Re EAR, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- In Re MVG, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.