in the Interest of D.A.R.
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.
Appellant K.E.M., biological mother of D.A.R., timely filed a notice of appeal in this case on February 6, 2006, contesting the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights. In two points, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by delaying the appointment of appellate counsel and that her trial counsel committed ineffective assistance. Appellant does not challenge the constitutionality of section 263.405® of the Texas Family Code.
Appellant’s two points on appeal do not appear in her statement of points or motion for new trial. Historically, this…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- In the Interest of E.A.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- In the Interest of D.R.L.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- in the Interest of S.J.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- in the Interest of J.O.A., T.J.A.M., T.J.M., and C.T.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- Pool v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- In the Interest of R.M.R., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
- In the Interests of R.J.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In the Interest of J.W.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.