Legal Opinion

In Re Larkin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1951No. 5764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

The record discloses that this appeal was taken from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the examiner rejecting claims 1-9, 12-20, and 24, 26 and 27 of appellant’s application for a patent on alleged new and useful improvements in a heat exchanger, together with the machine for and the method of making the heat exchanger, which is used, by way of example, for refrigeration apparatus.

Claims 1, 20, and 24 are illustrative. They read as follows:

“L A heat exchanger having a surface and a conduit on said surface, said conduit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re AckenbachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. In re ShoemakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. In re CoulterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. In re KuhnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. In re ErnstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Application of LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. Application of Norman P. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API