In re Ernst
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting, in view of the prior art, claims 19 and 31 of appellant’s application for a patent directed to a method of drawing a work piece; claims 22 to 24, 26 to 30, and 32, directed to an apparatus, having been allowed by the Primary Examiner.
The alleged invention relates to “a hydraulic multiple action automobile body press, in which, for shaping the work piece in a plurality of steps, only one power unit is required, acting all the while through…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re William J. KingCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In re WillifordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Chenault v. Nebraska Farm Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1956
- In Re LarkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951