Legal Opinion

In re Ernst

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 28, 1945No. 5011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting, in view of the prior art, claims 19 and 31 of appellant’s application for a patent directed to a method of drawing a work piece; claims 22 to 24, 26 to 30, and 32, directed to an apparatus, having been allowed by the Primary Examiner.

The alleged invention relates to “a hydraulic multiple action automobile body press, in which, for shaping the work piece in a plurality of steps, only one power unit is required, acting all the while through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re William J. KingCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. In re WillifordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Chenault v. Nebraska Farm Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1956
  4. In Re LarkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API