Legal Opinion
In Re Ackenbach
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 19, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2532PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
Earl Ackenbaeh filed his application, serial No. 221,908, in the Patent Office on September 26, 1927, claiming a patent for a process for producing advertising literature by combining paint stenciling with printing. The Examiner rejected claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, and this action was sustained by the Board of Appeals. The references relied upon by the Board of Appeals vere as follows: Hiett’s Manual of Stencil Screen Process Work, Indianapolis, 1926, page 38; Johnston, 1,189,453, July 4, 1916; Woodbury, 1,209,097, December 19, 1916; Beck et ah, 1,254,764,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & SonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Lnp Engineering Plastics, Inc. And Kawasaki Chemical Holding Co., Inc. v. Miller Waste Mills, Inc. (Trading as Rtp Company), Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eon Labels, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In Re William J. KingCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Emi Group North America, Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.