Legal Opinion

In re Shoemaker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 6, 1936No. 3558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims Nos. 1 to-11, inclusive, 13, and 14 in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a composite bearing element consisting of a body or backing member' of iron, steel, brass, or other metal, and a lining or bearing metal facing of hardened lead alloy, such as “Satco- metal,” “Frary metal,.” “Bahnmetall,” or certain types of “Babbitt metal,” joined together *1034by means of an intervening bonding layer of solder,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re PattonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. Application of Arthur P. ShepardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of Stephane Dufaure De LajarteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. In Re LarkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Morton v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API