Legal Opinion

Campfire Land Co. v. Jolin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1972No. 285-288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented which dispose of this appeal:

1. Did the trial court properly sustain the demurrer?

2. Are the orders denying the motions for a continuance and for a bill of particulars appealable ?

Was the demurrer properly sustained?

Are the Osiers necessary and indispensable parties?

Appellants primarily contend on appeal that the Oster family are necessary and indispensable parties to these actions.

“ ‘ [A] n indispensable party is one who has such an interest in the subject matter of the controversy that a final decree cannot be rendered between the other parties to the suit without…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Marshfield Clinic v. DoegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wesolowski v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Borde v. HakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Lee v. Threshermen's Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jolin v. OsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States ex rel. Mosay v. Buffalo Bros. Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. North Central Dairymen's Cooperative v. TemkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United States v. Buffalo Brothers Management, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API