Campfire Land Co. v. Jolin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two issues are presented which dispose of this appeal:
1. Did the trial court properly sustain the demurrer?
2. Are the orders denying the motions for a continuance and for a bill of particulars appealable ?
Was the demurrer properly sustained?
Are the Osiers necessary and indispensable parties?
Appellants primarily contend on appeal that the Oster family are necessary and indispensable parties to these actions.
“ ‘ [A] n indispensable party is one who has such an interest in the subject matter of the controversy that a final decree cannot be rendered between the other parties to the suit without…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Marshfield Clinic v. DoegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Wesolowski v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Borde v. HakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Lee v. Threshermen's Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jolin v. OsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- United States ex rel. Mosay v. Buffalo Bros. Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- North Central Dairymen's Cooperative v. TemkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Buffalo Brothers Management, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994