Legal Opinion

Borde v. Hake

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1969No. 144PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Neither of the parties to this lawsuit seriously disputes the propriety of the judge’s order abating the entire lawsuit. The dispute, as the parties see it, centers on whether the action should be merely suspended, as contended by the plaintiff, until the necessary party cannot be joined; or whether, as contended by the defendants, the suit should have been dismissed without prejudice. At first impression the distinction between these two positions would appear to be without substantial difference. However, the statute of limitations on the personal injury expired on July 9, 1965, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haase v. SawickiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Booth v. FrankensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Ausen v. MoriartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Dennis D. Dufour v. Progressive Classic Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Kochel v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Achtor v. Pewaukee Lake Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API