Legal Opinion

Jolin v. Oster

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1972No. 24PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Although a number of new issues are presented on this appeal, much of appellant’s grievance is with this court’s earlier determination in the first appeal to the effect that a joint adventure can survive incorporation. Since that decision this court reaffirmed this proposition in McDonald v. McDonald. 3 We do not intend on this appeal to deal in extenso with these arguments which constitute an attempt to reargue the issues decided in the first case. We will devote this opinion for the most part to considering issues advanced by appellant as to errors that would require a reversal of the trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. Monona Shores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bach v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. McDonald v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Olympia Hotels Corp. v. Johnson Wax Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Wittke v. State Ex Rel. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Christos N. Kritikos and Eastern Shipping Company v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Lau v. Valu-Bilt Homes, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API