Wesolowski v. Erickson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The questions involved are: (1) Was the counterclaim pleadable; (2) was the motion to strike proper or was it in effect a demurrer; (3) if a demurrer, did it search the record so as to test the sufficiency of the complaint ?
Whether the counterclaim is pleadable depends on whether the plaintiff is suing as an individual or in a representative capacity, and whether the defendant association is such a defendant as can plead a counterclaim. The main difficulty with the complaint is that it does not expressly state the plaintiff is suing in a representative capacity. The appellant relies on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Brahm v. M. C. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Friedrich v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Isaacs v. Milwaukee Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Durkin v. Board of Police & Fire Commissioners for City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Lees v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Becker v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Shelstad v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.