Legal Opinion

Wesolowski v. Erickson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1958PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The questions involved are: (1) Was the counterclaim pleadable; (2) was the motion to strike proper or was it in effect a demurrer; (3) if a demurrer, did it search the record so as to test the sufficiency of the complaint ?

Whether the counterclaim is pleadable depends on whether the plaintiff is suing as an individual or in a representative capacity, and whether the defendant association is such a defendant as can plead a counterclaim. The main difficulty with the complaint is that it does not expressly state the plaintiff is suing in a representative capacity. The appellant relies on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Brahm v. M. C. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Friedrich v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Isaacs v. Milwaukee Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Durkin v. Board of Police & Fire Commissioners for City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lees v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Becker v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Shelstad v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API