Legal Opinion

Marshfield Clinic v. Doege

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1955PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

When there is excess of parties plaintiff, a motion to strike, and not a demurrer, is the proper procedure with which to challenge the complaint of a party plaintiff who has no interest in the subject matter alleged therein. State ex rel. Kratche v. Civil Court (1923), 179 Wis. 270, 272, 191 N. W. 507. See also 2 Wisconsin Pleading and Practice (3d ed.), p. 132, sec. 13.43.

A motion to strike is addressed to the sound discretion of the court. 41 Am. Jur., Pleading, p. 532, sec. 354.

The complaint sets forth the provisions of the contract upon which the individual plaintiffs rely in their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Chase v. DodgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gross v. HeckertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Landauer v. EspenhainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Oeland v. WoldenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Youmans v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rose v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. Monona Shores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McGivern v. Amasa Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Daniel Marx v. Richard L. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API