Legal Opinion

Lerma v. County of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 2004No. G032120PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

There are times when respect for the human condition dictates a compassionate response to a request for a continuance. This is one of those times.

In the case before us, plaintiffs’ counsel was served with a motion for summary judgment on the day he was admitted to the hospital to have his cancerous bladder removed. The attorney was unaware that he had been served with the motion until the day after he was released from the hospital. He then had two business days in which to obtain affidavits, and prepare and file an opposition to the motion, or lose his clients’ case. Even…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roth v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Scott v. CIBA Vision Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Frazee v. SeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. MungiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bozzi v. NORDSTROM, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Futrell v. Payday California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Oliveros v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Granadino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API