Legal Opinion
Frazee v. Seely
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 2002No. G025981PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Debra L. Frazee appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Hall Seely, Katia Diehl, the law firm of Seely & Russell (S & R), Michelle Elizabeth Hales, Robert P. Etienne, and the law firm of Hales, Hales & Etienne (H, H & E). Frazee contends the court erred by granting summary judgment in her malpractice action for the following reasons: (1) the court granted summary judgment without allowing oral argument; (2) it incorrectly denied her request for a continuance to conduct further discovery to oppose the summary judgment motion; (3) it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Ochoa v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Wilson v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Parkview Villas Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Village Nurseries v. GreenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Andrews v. Mobile Aire EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.