Legal Opinion

Oliveros v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2004No. B163333PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in denying the request of defendant County of Los Angeles (County) for a trial continuance due to the engagement of its attorney in another trial. We conclude that it did, and so reverse the judgment.

FACTS

Plaintiff Veronica Oliveros suffered a brain injury following open-heart surgery at Harbor General-UCLA Medical Center. Mrs. Oliveros and her husband, Jesus Oliveros (together, plaintiffs) filed the present action for medical malpractice, products liability, loss of services, and loss of consortium…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wantuch v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Cordova v. Vons Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bongiovi v. SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. MungiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Freeman v. SullivantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Cottini v. Enloe Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API