Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Minor v. Eschen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1995No. 95-521PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Minor must establish (1) a clear legal right to be restored to the municipal payroll and to an award of back pay, (2) a corresponding clear legal duty to perform such acts on the part of Eschen, and (3) the lack of a plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Carter v. Wilkinson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 65, 637 N.E.2d 1. Before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated, (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and (3) it appears from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Carter v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. DeBrosse v. CoolOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Turner v. HoukOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API