Legal Opinion

Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of Dayton

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2006No. 05-3630PublishedCited by 270 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

This case arose as a § 1983 claim brought by Plaintiff-Appellee Susan Fisler Silberstein for alleged wrongful termination in violation of her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. City of Dayton Civil Service Board Members James Lindsey (“Lindsey”), Talbert Grooms (“Grooms”), and Betty Toney (“Toney”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Board Members”), moved for summary judgment based on the defense of qualified immunity as to both the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment claims. The Board Members now appeal the district court’s May 28, 2004 order denying…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by270 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Roane County, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Scott Peatross v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. James Maben v. Troy ThelenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Dominguez v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API