Carlton v. Saville
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBROWiN, J.
The intervener moves to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal from, an order denying a new trial. The motion, is made on six different grounds. The first and second of' these will be considered last.- The third ground is that a previous -appeal Was taken. It appearsj‘-that whatever previous appeal was táken was abandoned, and--'therefore furnishes no ground for dismissal of this appeal. The fourth ground is that the time within which to appeal from, the order denying a new trial expired on March 23, .and appeal was not taken until July 2, more than three months after the expiration of- time for appeal.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Brady v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- McVay v. BridgmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- McHarg v. Commonwealth Finance Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Vassilos v. ArnoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re B.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Nelson v. KittelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Bell v. JacobsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931