Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Saville

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1929No. File No. 6561PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBROWiN, J.

The intervener moves to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal from, an order denying a new trial. The motion, is made on six different grounds. The first and second of' these will be considered last.- The third ground is that a previous -appeal Was taken. It appearsj‘-that whatever previous appeal was táken was abandoned, and--'therefore furnishes no ground for dismissal of this appeal. The fourth ground is that the time within which to appeal from, the order denying a new trial expired on March 23, .and appeal was not taken until July 2, more than three months after the expiration of- time for appeal.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brady v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McVay v. BridgmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. McHarg v. Commonwealth Finance Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Vassilos v. ArnoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re B.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Nelson v. KittelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bell v. JacobsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API