In re B.C.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Pending before this Court are motions to dismiss in four abuse and neglect appeals. The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) applies to these proceedings. In each instance, a parent appeals termination of parental rights. Although a Tribe intervened in each case at the circuit court level, none of the appealing parents served a notice of appeal on the intervening Tribe. The State contends that this failure to serve a notice of appeal requires dismissal.
Analysis and Decision
[¶ 2.] The question we must answer is whether failure to serve an intervening *351Tribe with a notice of appeal is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Matter of Adoption of HallowayUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Steiner v. County of MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- People ex rel. M.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FlawsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Rock Creek FarmsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Lake Hendricks Improvement Ass'n v. Brookings County Planning & Zoning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of MurphySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Interest of S.A. and Interest of E.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.