Legal Opinion

Bell v. Jacobs

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1931No. File No. 6839Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

After verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court took the motion under advisement and three months later denied it. Pending decision of the motion, plaintiff took no steps for a motion for a new trial, but within a week thereafter procured an order requiring defendant to show cause why time for giving notice of intention to *2move for a new trial and to 'bring spch motion to- a hearing should not be extended “and to fix another time within which said acts and all other matters relating thereto may be done and performed; for a period of ninety days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nerger v. Commercial Mut. Fire Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Carlton v. SavilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API