Legal Opinion

Peters v. Lohr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1910PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hamlin County. Hon. George H. Marquis, Judge. • Action by James W. S. Peters against Mary V. Rohr and others. From a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

McCOY. J.

The plaintiff alleges that he is the owner in fee of a certain parcel of real estate situated in Hamlin ■ county. That defendant claims an interest therein adverse to plaintiff under and by virtue of a tax deed, which plaintiff alleges was .wrongfully and unlawfully issued by the treasurer of said Hamlin county. The complaint alleges various irregularities' in the assessment and tax sale under which said deed was issued. Plaintiff demanded judgment that defendant be required to set forth his claim of title to said premises, and that said tax deed be decreed by the court to be null…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bandow v. WolvenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Avant v. FlynnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Thomas v. RyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Burleigh v. HechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bandow v. WolvenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Seiler v. WhitingArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API