Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Kittelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1947No. Files Nos. 8888 and 8906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOHLHETER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff and appellant brought this action against one Olaf Kittelson to recover for certain seed grain and labor. Olaf Kittelson as defendant served and filed an answer and counterclaim. A garnishee summons and affidavit in garnishment were also served on Olaf Kittelson, as defendant, and upon Eric Anderson and the Farmers State Bank of Lyons as garnishee defendants. An affidavit of disclosure in garnishment was made by Eric Anderson as garnishee admitting liability, but the said bank made no disclosure and is in default.

Issue was joined in the main action and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Teter v. IrwinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Seattle Trust Co. v. PitnerWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lieuallen v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Brennan v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berke v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nelson v. KittelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API