Legal Opinion
Bayramoglu v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 1981No. Civ. 51630PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, J.
Petitioner Fikri Bayramoglu was charged by complaint with the crime of murder. After a preliminary examination, a magistrate held him to answer to the charge in respondent court. When an information accusing him of murder was filed, respondent court suspended the proceedings pending a determination of his present mental competence pursuant to Penal Code section 1368. The issue was tried by a jury, which found that he was competent to stand trial on the murder charge. He thereupon moved the court for an order setting aside the information, pursuant to Penal Code section 995,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hale v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Chambers v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ostrander v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re Marriage of BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stanton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. CadoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. PenningtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. Vo CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.