Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1987No. G005121PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

In this case we hold the prosecution’s failure to disclose evidence material to defense cross-examination of eyewitnesses at a preliminary hearing entitles the defendant to have an element of the charged offense, gross negligence, stricken from the information, leaving the remaining charge as a misdemeanor.

Petitioner Josephine Stanton was initially charged with misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence. (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. (c)(1).) Approximately one month later the district attorney’s office received an investigative report from the civil attorney for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. Ramirez & VillarrealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Currie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Merrill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API