Stanton v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALLIN, J.
In this case we hold the prosecution’s failure to disclose evidence material to defense cross-examination of eyewitnesses at a preliminary hearing entitles the defendant to have an element of the charged offense, gross negligence, stricken from the information, leaving the remaining charge as a misdemeanor.
Petitioner Josephine Stanton was initially charged with misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence. (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. (c)(1).) Approximately one month later the district attorney’s office received an investigative report from the civil attorney for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. Ramirez & VillarrealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Currie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Merrill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.