Legal Opinion

People v. Pennington

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1991No. A049080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold it was error to set aside an information solely because the defendant was represented at his preliminary hearing by a deputy public defender, who thereafter discovered for the first time that a prosecution witness had previously been represented by the public defender’s office. We conclude no substantial right of the defendant was denied at the preliminary hearing, since the deputy had no knowledge that his office had a potential conflict of interest.

The People appeal from an order setting aside an information charging defendant Anthony Pennington with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. BoninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. StandishCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Jackson v. Superior Court of Contra Costa Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Jackson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. People v. StandishCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API