Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Banks

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1974No. Civ. 34453PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Janice Christensen Banks appeals from a judgment of marital dissolution insofar as her request for restoration of maiden name was denied.

The cause was tried very briefly as an uncontested matter. Pertinent to this appeal is the following colloquy, which occurred just before the taking of testimony, between the court and counsel for the wife:

“Mr. Crenna: . . . The Court shall also order that petitioner shall be restored to her maiden name, Janice Christensen, effective by entry of final judgment of this —
“The Court: I don’t know whether I will or not. She’s got three…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. In Re Marriage of McKimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In Re RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. In Re Application of LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Egner v. EgnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Bayramoglu v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API