People v. Duncan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
A defendant was found to be incompetent five months after his preliminary hearing, and criminal proceedings were suspended. After his competence was restored, he made a nonstatutory motion to dismiss the case. He argued that he had been incompetent at the time of the preliminary hearing, which rendered his commitment unlawful. The trial court granted his motion. We affirm.
Facts
A preliminary hearing was held following respondent Carl Roy Duncan’s arrest for robbery. The evidence showed that he was in the lobby of a residential hotel in downtown Los Angeles where he struck a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CadoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Lee C. (In re Estate of Lee C.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Conservatorship of Lee C.California Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.