Legal Opinion
Creekmore v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1929No. 18370PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LESTER, Y. O. J.
The parties to this action appear in the reverse order to that in the district court, and will be referred to as they appeared there.
The plaintiff, city of Tulsa, on the 5th day of July, 1923, filed in the district court of Delaware county, Okla., its petition for the condemnation of a certain tract of land belonging to the defendant, W. J. Creek-more, for the purpose of constructing a dam and impounding a large lake of water for the purpose of supplying the inhabitants of the city of Tulsa with water. On the 21st day of July, 1923, C. H. Baskin, sitting as a judge of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Trower v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Cit. State Bank of Lawton v. Chattanooga State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Duncan v. McAlester-choctaw Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. ThamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Swift & Co. v. KirkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Greenwalt v. Oklarado Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934