Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Creekmore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1934No. 23851PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Craig county in favor of the defendant in error, a landowner, against the plaintiff in error, who had condemned certain land for municipal waterworks purposes, for the amount of damages sustained by reason of the condemnation of the land.

The record shows that commissioners were appointed in the condemnation proceeding by the district court of Delaware county on the 21st day of July, 1923; that they fixed the amount of damage sustained by the landowner at $10,000; that the city of Tulsa objected thereto ; that a jury of twelve men, by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Idaho-Western Railway Co. v. Columbia Conference of Evangelical Lutheran Augustana SynodIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. School District v. Phoenix Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  3. Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. City of Cape Girardeau v. HunzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Crowther v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Graham v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Missouri State Park Board v. McDanielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Grand River Dam Authority v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API