Legal Opinion
George F. Frey, Jr., and Edward A. Cox, Jr., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. The Commodity Exchange Authority
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 11, 1977No. 74-1775PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge.
We are asked in this appeal to decide whether a respondent, charged in an administrative proceeding with “manipulating the price of a commodity for future delivery” in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 9, 13, and 13(b), is entitled as a matter of right to pre-hearing discovery. The district court has held that the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 15, grants the plaintiffs-appellees in this case the right to pre-hearing discovery by means of subpoenas duces tecum and depositions. The judge enjoined the disciplinary proceedings which were being held…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Richard Murillo v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the U. S. Department of HewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Superior Forwarding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- General Finance Corporation, Postal Finance Company, and Barclaysamericancorporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Rosenthal & Company, Etc. v. William T. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.