Legal Opinion

Uniroyal, Inc. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 5, 1978No. 77-1970PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, District Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether Executive Order 11246, which prohibits discriminatory employment practices by all government contractors, grants sufficient rulemaking authority to the Department of Labor to permit the use of pre-hearing discovery techniques and administrative subpoenas in administrative enforcement proceedings. Appellant Uniroyal, Inc., brought this collateral pre-enforcement action in the district court challenging these procedures. The district court denied Uniroyal’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granted summary judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Woodruff v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. First American Title Insurance Co. v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rosenthal & Company, Etc. v. William T. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  5. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. DozierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API