Legal Opinion
Richard Murillo v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the U. S. Department of Hew
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1978No. 76-3533PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs below appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand.
I. Statement of the Case
In January of 1974, appellant Murillo’s father allegedly went repeatedly to Social Security Administration (SSA) offices and orally inquired about benefits for appellant Murillo under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381. On each occasion he was allegedly erroneously informed orally that his son was not eligible, and he did not make a written application for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Trevor A. Laing v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ronald L. BOETTCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Herron v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- James G. Pattillo v. James R. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Honea v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1980
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.