Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Travelers Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The policy upon which this action was based was issued on September 9, 1926, and thereafter renewed annually, including a renewal on September 9, 1928, for the ensuing year. During that year, the casualty occurred, which gave rise to the claim for indemnity. In .relation to the coverage afforded by that policy, there was the following provision:

“Four — This agreement shall exclude any obligation of the company
“(b) While any disclosed automobile is being driven in any race or competitive speed test ór by any person under the age fixed by law or under sixteen years in any event, or as respects…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hankins v. Rockford Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bernard v. Wisconsin Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kiviniemi v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Segall v. Ohio Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Witzko v. KoenigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Albert v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Locke v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Holland Supply Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API